rediff ILAND
Welcome Guest, | Create your own iLand| Sign In  | New User? Get Started
Home
iLand
Blogs
Friends/Contributors
Guestbook  
 
surendra
uplenchiwar

Categories
Politics
Cricket
Blogs
Books
My Top Posts
AASAM..SHAME.......
Nandigram Violen...
BCCI A Political...
What is an RSS feed?
RSS Feed 
uplenchiwar.rediffiland.com/ 
Recent Posts
By  surendra uplenchiwar   08:19 | 23/Jan/2008 | 0 Comment(s)
Books

for quality used, rare, and out-of-print books online

click the following link

http://www.jdoqocy.com/click-2372680-10468647

 

can save 60% by buying used copies or international edition textbooks at above site.

 

 

Permalink 
By  surendra uplenchiwar   07:33 | 17/Jan/2008 | 3 Comment(s)
Need justice

Need justice This is the reaction to what has happened in Aasam on 24,Nov 2007. Yesterday one of the news channel has shown horriable photographs and video of injustice done to the tribal people who were asking for thier reservation. By seeing the video we cant believe that how can people of same race can be bitten of by people itself. It is totally against the humanity. According to the Indian Constitution, every people of India can ask for his rights and no one has right to interfere in that, he has the freedom of expressing. The people responsible for this incident are the people who have the responsibilty of securing the rights of the people. By seeing the video we see that the police force is the mere spectator of the incident. I think that each and every citizen of this country should condemn this incident. It is shocking to see that after 53 days of this incident we are able to understand the whole picture of Guhawati Incident. The media is responsible for not attending to this protest of tribal people and may be they have known about the incident  but have not shown this to the people of India. If a sting operation can be operated, this brutal incident has to highlited on the day of occurance. The Government Officers and who so ever be the people responsible for this incident should be sacked and punished. It is a shame that the Government of Aasam has not taking any steps to provide justice to this people affected. Government should see that this type of incidents should not repeat again and should take some immediate action on the incident.

Permalink 
By  surendra uplenchiwar   09:18 | 8/Dec/2007 | 4 Comment(s)
Mr.Narendra Modi in Chakraview

       Yesterdays remarks of Javed Akhtar(On AAJTAK) ,reknowed lyrics was totaly based on wrong things and he is walking on steps of Congress in Gujrat.He filed a case in SC against the Narendra Modi on his remarks on Soharbuddin encounter case.Why he is supporting the Criminal who was shot dead in encounter.At starting on AAJTak he told that he has not related to any political party.he has also supported to Taslima Nasrin.But i didn't find his support to Nandigram 's people,the people are getting injustice in Nandigram.why he has not file a case against a CM of West Bengal for voilating the law.also he to see the case of AFJAL GURU ,master mind of attack on parliment .I am feeling very sad ,b'coz  people like javed akhtar are playing a game of politics.Now ,He is not a common man .He is showed his justure by playing role of politics.About modi ,i can say in last five years he has done the so many developments in Gujrat.so why everybody want to down the position of CM of Gujrat,No voilence occured in Gujrat in last 5 years of his tenure.So i suggest to all people of Gujrat,vote for Modi only on the of Gujrat developments,not on conspiracy created by Congress and people like Javed akhtar


 


 

Permalink 
By  surendra uplenchiwar   11:11 | 26/Nov/2007 | 1 Comment(s)
Nandigram Violence

Nandigram Violence

A study by two economists from the US Federal Reserve (A Tale of Two States: Maharashtra and West Bengal by Amartya Lahiri and Kei-Mu Yi) shows how the two states, among the richest in the country in 1960, have diverged dramatically. Bengal, which had a per capita income of 105 per cent of Maharashtra's in 1960, has managed to bring it down to a mere 69 per cent of Maharashtra's by 1995! The authors conclude that this is directly correlated with Communist control of Bengal. This scenario should change. Whatever is going on today in west Bengal is not good for common man and such a shame for India.

Wednesday, March 14, 2007 .once again violence erupted in Nandigram and at least 14 people have died and 30 injured in clashes between police and protesters.
The trouble started when a large police force tried to break the Nandigram blockade. However, they were confronted by a 5000-strong mob which began hurling bricks on them.
The police resorted with teargas and a mild lathicharge and then rubber bullets. But when the villagers started shooting with pipe guns, the police opened fire.

Till the date still the same this is going on.Nothing has change.

March month is the  exam month  but it has postponed to April.

But most important thing is a large percentage of Nandigram's population is Muslim, its role was not unexpected. It has also to be clarified that the Jamiat was not involved in Wednesday's disturbances, which were the handiwork of a virtually unknown outfit, the All India Muslim Front, but the Jamiat has nevertheless voiced its opposition to Taslima Nasreen's continued stay in India.

There wasn't much advance thinking before the chief minister and his party, decided to neutralise the police and send in the party's armed cadres to wrest Nandigram from the Opposition's control. To control the situation, the West Bengal government had to call in the army and impose curfew in several Muslim-majority areas in the city.

While there has been countrywide condemnation of arson and rape by the attackers in Nandigram, this new evidence of the anger of the Muslims is a worrisome signal.

As it is, the involvement of Naxalites means the presence of shadowy underground organisations, which thrive in anarchic conditions. They will have little hesitation in teaming up with Muslim fundamentalists to foment communal trouble - something that mainstream parties like the Trinamool Congress will not like to do.

CPI-M is also mixing up the Taslima Nasreen affair with Nandigram. This was the first time that the 'attack' by cadres of the Communist Party of India-Marxist (CPI-M) on opposition strongholds in Nandigram was mixed up with the stay of the controversial Bangladeshi writer in India. Because Communist are secular and minority-friendly leftist government of West Bengal. Judiciary and the National Human Rights Commission also criticised the the aggressive tactics of CPI-M.What this means is that in the event of an election, the Left Front cannot be as sure of its success as before, especially if sizable sections of Muslims are persuaded by their leaders to refrain from voting. For the first time since 1977, the Communists may be in danger of losing West Bengal. Current condition showing is that President rule should be imposed in West Bengal.Centre should sack this Communist government. Nandigram carnage initiated by Buddhadeb and CPM only. Buddhdeb and CPM actively initiated the mass murder misusing state law (police force).

There is a total collapse of law& order in Nandigram, now Dr.Man Mohan made a Deal that he will say nothing about Nandigram and in return CPI (M) would allow him to sign the Indo-US Deal.

Permalink 
By  surendra uplenchiwar   10:36 | 23/Nov/2007 | 1 Comment(s)
BCCI A Political game

BCCI-A political game







BCCI is well known and richest sporting body for cricket in India.But sorry,An FIR was filed against nine top officials of the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) and Hyderabad Cricket Association (HCA) on Wednesday for allegedly misappropriating funds during the one-day international cricket match between India and Australia. That what happen if politically well background people involved in governing body.Political people do not know anything about this cricket but they are operating the hole cricket board without any knowledge of cricket.what about Anshuman Gaikwad,Arun Lal,Kapil Dev,Sunil Gavskar? like so many veterian cricketer available to take charge of this BCCI.But our Indian politics will not give to these people a single chance.Because they have not supported by the political party.At least selection comitee should be free from this type of politics.We know all about Pawar-Dalmiya equation.But then, everything is fair in love, war and BCCI politics. The Board of Control for Cricket in India scoffed at suggestions that the sensational leak of Greg Chappell's e-mail was because of Board politics. Is BCCI politics hampering Indian cricket?Can the BCCI (Board of Control for Cricket in India), run by politicians and business tycoons,propel Indian team ahead? Will they also own some responsibility? Will they keep sucking the Indian cricket until some court bars them from doing so? These so-called ‘office bearers’, actlike Mafia and do not allow a general public scrutiny to take place. They do not have a website yet.They act with impunity, reward themselves as they wish and try to remain in power by hook or by crook. Apolitically motivated person who uses his position of influence to play out his petty politics, to the detriment of Indian cricket, it is strange when he speaks of accountability and responsibility.It is pathetic that our greatest players are subjected to humiliation by these power brokers. Cricket crazy Indians must question the credentials of these BCCI Mandarins. Our heroes have given us immense joy over these years and they deserve a graceful exit. Those who are for the removal of the trio must also try to ensure that the BCCI gets rid of these power brokers. Their accountability must be fixed and if found unable to deliver, these gentlemen must also be shown the door and their conduct during office should be probed thoroughly.Everything is fair in love, war and BCCI politics: even if it means doing a complete flip-flop, or double-somersault on their stands.but it should stop for better cricket of India.


Permalink 
By  surendra uplenchiwar   10:21 | 23/Nov/2007 | 0 Comment(s)
Governor’s controversy

 

Constitution of I India says that The Council of Ministers is collectively responsible to the House of the People (Lok Sabha).

 Every State has a Legislative Assembly.  Certain States have an upper House called State

Legislative Council.  Governor is the Head of a State.  There shall be a Governor for each

State and the executive power of the State shall be vested in him.  The council of Ministers

With the Chief Minister as its head advises the Governor in the discharge of the executive functions.  The Council of the Ministers of a state is collectively responsible to the Legislative Assembly of the State.

 

Under Article 156 (1) of the Constitution, the governor of a state holds his office at the

pleasure of the President. But the President acts by the advice of the government in power

in such matters. Which is why the news of the dismissal came from the Centre, although a Rashtrapati Bhavan communiqué had already notified that the said governors 'shall cease to hold office of governor of their respective states.'

            But politics is too much worst in India. Because earlier also done this type of dismissing of governor.

 

. In October 1980, then Tamil Nadu governor Prabhudas Patwari was dismissed,

demonstrating that the President's 'pleasure' under Article 156 (1) can be used by

the prime minister to dismiss any governor for political reasons, and without assigning

any cause. And in 1981, then Rajasthan governor Raghulal Tilak too was dismissed from office.  

                   The United Progressive Alliance government has dismissed four governors --

 Kidar Nath Sahni (Goa), Kailashpati Mishra (Gujarat), Babu Parmanand (Hariyana)

 And Vishnu Kant Shastri (Uttar Pradesh) -- who had been appointed during the

Tenure of the previous National Democratic Alliance government.

 

Why government has demonstrated 'gross constitutional impropriety'?

Everybody has there won ideology; they can express their views. Dismissing is improper with the dignity of high office. Anybody can keep relation with Non-profit organization.

In latest controversy of Karnatka, the BJP and JDS has given the list of MLA to form the Government in Karnataka but governor has taken so many days to decide .Why this is happening? Governor should have the power without scaring of loosing his position. Governor is the Head of a State, he having executive power to run the state.

 

Permalink